Arts, history, traditions, politics, and other.
Friday, 4 July 2014
All this but no peace neither Machar nor Kiier.
HOME | NEWS FRIDAY 4 JULY 2014
Central Equatoria governor warns over further bloodshed in fight for federalism
July 3, 2014 (JUBA) – The governor of South Sudan’s Central Equatoria state on Wednesday reiterated demands for a federal system of governance in the young nation, saying it was Equatorians who first proposed the idea, not rebel leader Riek Machar.
Addressing reporters in the capital, Juba, Clement Wani Konga said federalism was discussed at all the four greater Equatoria region conferences and that resolutions agreed upon were handed over to president Salva Kiir.
“The president of the republic has not said to us, no don’t speak about federalism. If he told somebody, it must be [James] Wani who is more close to him, but us as governors of Equatoria he never told us no and the resolutions are all with him,” he said.
Konga, who dismissed an alleged assassination attempt on his life, said he would not accept federalism derived though bloodshed.
“He (Machar) wants only to woo the Equatoria people to support him. So I will not accept a federalism that is brought through blood,” remarked the governor.
“The blood Nuer people are shedding is not for federalism. Riek is killing Nuer people so that he becomes the president. Somebody of who have just turned his back to the presidency one meter away, what can you do for him?” he added.
WARRING PARTIES ACCUSED
Governor Konga accused the two major rival tribes of possessing negative attitudes towards the people of his region, alleging Equatorian sons and daughters serving in the police and army were being deliberately disarmed.
“There is disarmament going on now against the Equatoria, those in the police, those who are in the army. Can one tribe or two tribes make a nation? No. South Sudan is for us all and all of us contributed in kind even those who were on the government side”, Konga said.
The Dinka and the Nuer tribes, he claimed, possessed attitudes that were totally against his region and that both warned they would turn to Equatorians after war.
“Those big tribes, the Dinka and the Nuer, the Dinka say after finishing with Nuer, they will turn to the Equatoria. The Nuer says you have led us along, when you finish serving the Dinka they will turn against Equatoria. We have heard this and we are waiting for it. We are not afraid,” he said.
“Nobody can sit on head. Nobody can sit on the head of Equatoria. We are all equal. What goodness will you get by killing your brother in cold blood? And all these activities have indicated, have shown themselves”, be added.
CLAIMS DISMISSED
Meanwhile, the governor distanced himself from claims that he aided rebel leader Machar’s escape out of Juba following last year outbreak of violence.
“There is in the internet, that I clement helped Riek Machar to escape from Juba. Since in the morning of 16, 17 we have been together with the president of the republic, how could I go and helped Riek Machar to get out of Juba?” he said.
“It is the army that failed to ensure that Riek shouldn’t get out of Juba. And even when he was going people were sending information instead of cutting him off, cutting the route off so that he don’t cross the river Nile,” he added.
Konga further warned against what he described as mistreatment of Equatorians who mobilised to join the army after the eruption conflict, saying they were left to die despite their commitment to defend the country.
“As for us Equatorians, we have kept the president Salva. It is us who protect him since my return from Germany in 2012. It is not the Dinka who are keeping the president in power. It is us the Equatoria and if we are being disliked because of our frankness then there is something wrong. We shall never attack anybody,” said the governor.
“We are here to defend ourselves and we have not carried out any mobilization to support Riek Machar except the six pickup vehicles (Tashar) in Ngolobo in which a brigade has been deployed in the field and is doing well. But unfortunately they are not treated well. They are left as Equatorians. Sick or dead or hungry, they have only the Akm 47,” he added.
Konga, however, said his duty as the governor of the area was to mobilise the people to join the national army and that it was the responsibility of the army to look after the recruits to maintain them.
“The poorest people in the republic of South Sudan are Equatoria people. From the messenger to the president, they are well off. Did we complain? No,” he said.
The official urged South Sudanese to devote their energies and resources towards developing the country, emphasising that the law would deal with those causing problems in the country.
(ST)
Peace we need peace in Sudan.
ENGLISH
Achieving peace should be our demand first
07-04-2014 08:34 AM
Mahjoub Mohamed Saleh
The cause of peace in Sudan should be the central issue for all Sudanese political forces, so they are the foundation of all the crises that we face, we have been since our independence until today has been on the road ... that we fail to deal with it as a political issue, and we considered a security issue, ignoring that Venice will not solve the political issue, and will not provide a stable nor secure installed.
The causes of the civil war - which has been raging in Sudan since the rebellion band tropical town of Torit in Equateur Province in southern Sudan and to this day, that causes an inherited or updated - accumulated because of the failure to recognize and respect the diversity of the people of Sudan and the different ethnicities and contrast their culture, and increasing them separately to the overall policies that followed focused development and services in the central region, ignoring the parties, creating a sense of bitterness and a sense of accumulation of grievances and the marginalization and absence from the arena of national decision-making.
All of these phenomena is part of the challenges of the statement of the nation which has faced all African countries almost an hour of independence, which is seeking to build a unified nation from a group of rival tribes and conflicting Historically, because of the intense rivalry over natural resources, and build national unity - under such circumstances - is a big challenge, has suffered from many nations, and Europe - which now seem unified - History records that nation-states consolidated in place Dwyladtha been scattered across a sea of blood.
Rather than learn from these historical lessons, and instead of that we fabricate and means to unite the people of Sudan based on the recognition Btnoahm and Taddhm and respect for diversity and management of the affairs of the country on the basis of equity and justice and equal opportunity, we have sought to impose a vision of a centralized dedicated to the dominance of the center at the expense of the parties, Vzdna fire heats up , and when war broke out was our reaction single most important is to try to impose the authority of state repression and the use of the gun to resolve a political crisis.
Venice can be kept security stable country and protect it from external aggression, but they do not achieve stable if the battles revolve inside their own home and if the guns pointed toward the citizenry, was praying the Sudanese army, which runs the battles are not interrupted in various parts of Sudan, and across the decades. but all this was not feasible and did not keep us up to southern Sudan as part of the nation, did not address the Darfur crisis, and did not extinguish the flames of rebellion in the south of the Blue Nile or South Kordofan, but was the result of seeking to impose a military solution also praying that the country's resources.
Sudan's economy Bhishachth and limitations is not able to bear the burdens of war expensive cost does not seem to end in sight, and the crisis we are experiencing now is part of it goes back to the funds that we can benefit from them in the development or the provision of services should be directed to finance the mechanism of war and the war expensive in lives and money, which of course creates internal tensions reflect negatively on the stability of the safe, and creates displacement, abandonment and entire regions of the workforce, which increases the severity of the economic crisis and the decline in production and widespread unemployment.
If the civil war on this level of risk, and so much of the cost of material and human resources, it was better to occupies a place high on the strategies and programs for all of our parties, and was better that motivated tragedies left behind by those wars, in order to take not only a position supportive of the peace, but to intensify efforts to get out of the quagmire of civil war, through peace is achieved through negotiation Qassed, and through in-depth studies of the roots of the crisis and its dimensions, and respect for pluralism, and the involvement of all citizens in decision-making in the management of their affairs, and activate their vehicles approved dispute resolution, and above all equitable sharing of wealth power and bias of the most backward regions to address the legacy of past policies dysfunctional, and will not be such an easy project to investigate, but when he begins to put the track on the right track.
So when the top of our national agenda of peace?
• mahgoubsalih@maktoob.com
07-04-2014 08:34 AM
Mahjoub Mohamed Saleh
The cause of peace in Sudan should be the central issue for all Sudanese political forces, so they are the foundation of all the crises that we face, we have been since our independence until today has been on the road ... that we fail to deal with it as a political issue, and we considered a security issue, ignoring that Venice will not solve the political issue, and will not provide a stable nor secure installed.
The causes of the civil war - which has been raging in Sudan since the rebellion band tropical town of Torit in Equateur Province in southern Sudan and to this day, that causes an inherited or updated - accumulated because of the failure to recognize and respect the diversity of the people of Sudan and the different ethnicities and contrast their culture, and increasing them separately to the overall policies that followed focused development and services in the central region, ignoring the parties, creating a sense of bitterness and a sense of accumulation of grievances and the marginalization and absence from the arena of national decision-making.
All of these phenomena is part of the challenges of the statement of the nation which has faced all African countries almost an hour of independence, which is seeking to build a unified nation from a group of rival tribes and conflicting Historically, because of the intense rivalry over natural resources, and build national unity - under such circumstances - is a big challenge, has suffered from many nations, and Europe - which now seem unified - History records that nation-states consolidated in place Dwyladtha been scattered across a sea of blood.
Rather than learn from these historical lessons, and instead of that we fabricate and means to unite the people of Sudan based on the recognition Btnoahm and Taddhm and respect for diversity and management of the affairs of the country on the basis of equity and justice and equal opportunity, we have sought to impose a vision of a centralized dedicated to the dominance of the center at the expense of the parties, Vzdna fire heats up , and when war broke out was our reaction single most important is to try to impose the authority of state repression and the use of the gun to resolve a political crisis.
Venice can be kept security stable country and protect it from external aggression, but they do not achieve stable if the battles revolve inside their own home and if the guns pointed toward the citizenry, was praying the Sudanese army, which runs the battles are not interrupted in various parts of Sudan, and across the decades. but all this was not feasible and did not keep us up to southern Sudan as part of the nation, did not address the Darfur crisis, and did not extinguish the flames of rebellion in the south of the Blue Nile or South Kordofan, but was the result of seeking to impose a military solution also praying that the country's resources.
Sudan's economy Bhishachth and limitations is not able to bear the burdens of war expensive cost does not seem to end in sight, and the crisis we are experiencing now is part of it goes back to the funds that we can benefit from them in the development or the provision of services should be directed to finance the mechanism of war and the war expensive in lives and money, which of course creates internal tensions reflect negatively on the stability of the safe, and creates displacement, abandonment and entire regions of the workforce, which increases the severity of the economic crisis and the decline in production and widespread unemployment.
If the civil war on this level of risk, and so much of the cost of material and human resources, it was better to occupies a place high on the strategies and programs for all of our parties, and was better that motivated tragedies left behind by those wars, in order to take not only a position supportive of the peace, but to intensify efforts to get out of the quagmire of civil war, through peace is achieved through negotiation Qassed, and through in-depth studies of the roots of the crisis and its dimensions, and respect for pluralism, and the involvement of all citizens in decision-making in the management of their affairs, and activate their vehicles approved dispute resolution, and above all equitable sharing of wealth power and bias of the most backward regions to address the legacy of past policies dysfunctional, and will not be such an easy project to investigate, but when he begins to put the track on the right track.
So when the top of our national agenda of peace?
• mahgoubsalih@maktoob.com
Sudan ill country of Africa is bleeding blood.
تحقيق السلام ينبغي أن يكون مطلبنا الأول
07-04-2014 08:34 AM
محجوب محمد صالح
قضية السلام في السودان ينبغي أن تكون هي القضية المركزية لكل القوى السياسية السودانية، ذلك أنها الأساس في كل الأزمات التي ظللنا نواجهها منذ استقلالنا وحتى اليوم وقد... الطريق يوم أن فشلنا في أن نتعامل معها كقضية سياسية، واعتبرناها قضية أمنية، متجاهلين أن البندقية لن تحل قضية سياسية، ولن توفر استقراراً ولا أمنا مثبتاً.
أسباب الحرب الأهلية -التي ظلت مستعرة في السودان منذ تمرد الفرقة الاستوائية في مدينة توريت في المديرية الاستوائية جنوبي السودان وإلى يوم الناس هذا، تلك الأسباب موروثة أو مستحدثة- تراكمت بسبب الفشل في إدراك واحترام تنوع أهل السودان واختلاف أعراقهم وتباين ثقافتهم، وزادها حدة أن مجمل السياسات التي اتبعت ركزت التنمية والخدمات في منطقة الوسط، متجاهلة الأطراف، مما خلق شعوراً بالمرارة وإحساساً بتراكم المظالم والتهميش والغياب عن ساحة القرار الوطني.
وكل هذه الظواهر جزء من تحديات بيان الأمة التي واجهت كل الدول الإفريقية تقريباً ساعة استقلالها، وهي تسعى لبناء أمة موحدة من مجموعة من القبائل المتناحرة والمتصارعة تاريخياً، بسبب تنافس محموم حول الموارد الطبيعية، وبناء الوحدة الوطنية -تحت مثل هذه الظروف- يشكل تحدياً كبيراً، وقد عانت منه دول كثيرة، وأوروبا -التي تبدو الآن موحدة- يسجل التاريخ أن توحيدها في دول قومية مكان دويلاتها المتناثرة تم عبر بحر من الدماء.
وبدلاً من أن نتعلم من تلك الدروس التاريخية، وبدلاً من أن نبتدع وسائل لتوحيد أهل السودان قائمة على الاعتراف بتنوعهم وتعددهم واحترام ذلك التنوع وإدارة شؤون البلاد على قاعدة من الإنصاف والعدل وتكافؤ الفرص، سعينا لفرض رؤية مركزية تكرس لهيمنة الوسط على حساب الأطراف، فزدنا النار اشتعالاً، وعندما اشتعلت الحروب كان رد فعلنا الأوحد والأهم هو محاولة فرض سلطة الدولة بالقمع واللجوء إلى البندقية لحل أزمة سياسية.
البندقية يمكن أن تحفظ أمن بلد مستقر وتحميها من عدوان خارجي، ولكنها لا تحقق استقراراً إذا كانت معاركها تدور داخل أوطانها وإذا كانت البنادق مصوبة نحو صدور المواطنين، وقد أرهقنا الجيش السوداني، وهو يدير معارك لا تنقطع في شتى أنحاء السودان، وعبر عقود من الزمان، ولكن ذلك كله لم يكن مجدياً ولم يصل بنا إلى الاحتفاظ بجنوب السودان جزءاً من الوطن، ولم يعالج أزمة دارفور، ولم يطفئ نيران التمرد في جنوب النيل الأزرق ولا جنوب كردفان، بل كانت نتيجة السعي بفرض الحل العسكري أن أرهقنا أيضاً موارد البلاد.
اقتصاد السودان بهشاشته ومحدوديته ليس قادراً على تحمل أعباء حرب غالية التكلفة لا تبدو نهايتها في الأفق، والأزمة التي نعيشها الآن جزء منها يعود إلى أن الاعتمادات المالية التي كنا يمكن أن نستفيد منها في التنمية أو تقديم الخدمات لا بد من توجيهها لتمويل الآلية الحربية والحرب باهظة التكاليف في الأنفس والأموال، وهي بطبيعة تخلق توترات داخلية تنعكس سلباً على الاستقرار الآمن، وتخلق حركات نزوح، وتخلي مناطق بأسرها من الأيدي العاملة، مما يزيد من حدة الأزمة الاقتصادية وانخفاض الإنتاج وانتشار البطالة.
إذا كانت الحرب الأهلية على هذا القدر من الخطر، وعلى هذا القدر من التكلفة المادية والبشرية، فكان الأجدر بها أن تحتل مكاناً متقدماً في استراتيجيات وبرامج كل أحزابنا، وكان الأجدر أن تحركهم المآسي التي تخلفها تلك الحروب، لكي يتخذوا ليس فقط موقفاً داعماً للسلام، بل إلى تكثيف الجهود للخروج من مستنقع الحرب الأهلية، عبر سلام يتحقق، عبر تفاوض قاصد، وعبر دراسات متعمقة لجذور الأزمة وأبعادها، واحترام للتعددية، وإشراك كافة المواطنين في صناعة القرار وفي إدارة شؤونهم، وتفعيل آلياتهم المعتمدة لفض النزاعات، وفوق هذا وذاك العدالة في اقتسام الثروة والسلطة، والانحياز للمناطق الأكثر تخلفاً لمعالجة موروثات السياسات السابقة المختلة، ولن يكون مثل هذا المشروع سهل التحقيق، لكنه حينما يبدأ يضع المسار على الطريق الصحيح.
فمتى يتصدر السلام أجندتنا الوطنية؟
• mahgoubsalih@maktoob.com
قضية السلام في السودان ينبغي أن تكون هي القضية المركزية لكل القوى السياسية السودانية، ذلك أنها الأساس في كل الأزمات التي ظللنا نواجهها منذ استقلالنا وحتى اليوم وقد... الطريق يوم أن فشلنا في أن نتعامل معها كقضية سياسية، واعتبرناها قضية أمنية، متجاهلين أن البندقية لن تحل قضية سياسية، ولن توفر استقراراً ولا أمنا مثبتاً.
أسباب الحرب الأهلية -التي ظلت مستعرة في السودان منذ تمرد الفرقة الاستوائية في مدينة توريت في المديرية الاستوائية جنوبي السودان وإلى يوم الناس هذا، تلك الأسباب موروثة أو مستحدثة- تراكمت بسبب الفشل في إدراك واحترام تنوع أهل السودان واختلاف أعراقهم وتباين ثقافتهم، وزادها حدة أن مجمل السياسات التي اتبعت ركزت التنمية والخدمات في منطقة الوسط، متجاهلة الأطراف، مما خلق شعوراً بالمرارة وإحساساً بتراكم المظالم والتهميش والغياب عن ساحة القرار الوطني.
وكل هذه الظواهر جزء من تحديات بيان الأمة التي واجهت كل الدول الإفريقية تقريباً ساعة استقلالها، وهي تسعى لبناء أمة موحدة من مجموعة من القبائل المتناحرة والمتصارعة تاريخياً، بسبب تنافس محموم حول الموارد الطبيعية، وبناء الوحدة الوطنية -تحت مثل هذه الظروف- يشكل تحدياً كبيراً، وقد عانت منه دول كثيرة، وأوروبا -التي تبدو الآن موحدة- يسجل التاريخ أن توحيدها في دول قومية مكان دويلاتها المتناثرة تم عبر بحر من الدماء.
وبدلاً من أن نتعلم من تلك الدروس التاريخية، وبدلاً من أن نبتدع وسائل لتوحيد أهل السودان قائمة على الاعتراف بتنوعهم وتعددهم واحترام ذلك التنوع وإدارة شؤون البلاد على قاعدة من الإنصاف والعدل وتكافؤ الفرص، سعينا لفرض رؤية مركزية تكرس لهيمنة الوسط على حساب الأطراف، فزدنا النار اشتعالاً، وعندما اشتعلت الحروب كان رد فعلنا الأوحد والأهم هو محاولة فرض سلطة الدولة بالقمع واللجوء إلى البندقية لحل أزمة سياسية.
البندقية يمكن أن تحفظ أمن بلد مستقر وتحميها من عدوان خارجي، ولكنها لا تحقق استقراراً إذا كانت معاركها تدور داخل أوطانها وإذا كانت البنادق مصوبة نحو صدور المواطنين، وقد أرهقنا الجيش السوداني، وهو يدير معارك لا تنقطع في شتى أنحاء السودان، وعبر عقود من الزمان، ولكن ذلك كله لم يكن مجدياً ولم يصل بنا إلى الاحتفاظ بجنوب السودان جزءاً من الوطن، ولم يعالج أزمة دارفور، ولم يطفئ نيران التمرد في جنوب النيل الأزرق ولا جنوب كردفان، بل كانت نتيجة السعي بفرض الحل العسكري أن أرهقنا أيضاً موارد البلاد.
اقتصاد السودان بهشاشته ومحدوديته ليس قادراً على تحمل أعباء حرب غالية التكلفة لا تبدو نهايتها في الأفق، والأزمة التي نعيشها الآن جزء منها يعود إلى أن الاعتمادات المالية التي كنا يمكن أن نستفيد منها في التنمية أو تقديم الخدمات لا بد من توجيهها لتمويل الآلية الحربية والحرب باهظة التكاليف في الأنفس والأموال، وهي بطبيعة تخلق توترات داخلية تنعكس سلباً على الاستقرار الآمن، وتخلق حركات نزوح، وتخلي مناطق بأسرها من الأيدي العاملة، مما يزيد من حدة الأزمة الاقتصادية وانخفاض الإنتاج وانتشار البطالة.
إذا كانت الحرب الأهلية على هذا القدر من الخطر، وعلى هذا القدر من التكلفة المادية والبشرية، فكان الأجدر بها أن تحتل مكاناً متقدماً في استراتيجيات وبرامج كل أحزابنا، وكان الأجدر أن تحركهم المآسي التي تخلفها تلك الحروب، لكي يتخذوا ليس فقط موقفاً داعماً للسلام، بل إلى تكثيف الجهود للخروج من مستنقع الحرب الأهلية، عبر سلام يتحقق، عبر تفاوض قاصد، وعبر دراسات متعمقة لجذور الأزمة وأبعادها، واحترام للتعددية، وإشراك كافة المواطنين في صناعة القرار وفي إدارة شؤونهم، وتفعيل آلياتهم المعتمدة لفض النزاعات، وفوق هذا وذاك العدالة في اقتسام الثروة والسلطة، والانحياز للمناطق الأكثر تخلفاً لمعالجة موروثات السياسات السابقة المختلة، ولن يكون مثل هذا المشروع سهل التحقيق، لكنه حينما يبدأ يضع المسار على الطريق الصحيح.
فمتى يتصدر السلام أجندتنا الوطنية؟
• mahgoubsalih@maktoob.com
انا سودانى مقيم قانونيا بايطاليا ومنها تزوجت وطلقت ولى ثلاث ابناء اكبرهم بالجيش الايطالى والاخر مهندس واصغرهم ابنتى محاميه بنقابه الموظفين - تغربت من السودان ١٩٧٣ وكان دون حرب ثم اشتعلت لكى تنتشر دارفور- جنوب كردفان- النيل الازرق - ىالنا من امه جاهله يحكمها حزب لا علاقت له بالاسلام انما هى عصابه لصوص
Thursday, 3 July 2014
ALSO THIS TRIBE TENTIONS BETWEEN BROTHERS.........SHAME ON YOU!!!
Sudanese troops to be deployed between Darfur, W. Kordofan to prevent tribal clashes
July 2, 2014 (KHARTOUM) – Authorities in West Kordofan and East Darfur states have ordered deployment of joint military troops to secure the dividing line between areas of Hamar and Ma’alia tribes following renewed fighting between the two ethnic groups which claimed lives of 75 people.
Twenty two tribesmen were killed in recent clashes between the two tribes in East Darfur state in which heavy and light weapons were used.
Tribal leaders pointed that clashes between Ma’alia and Hamar were triggered by a cattle looting incident.
The commissioner of Adeela locality, Ahmed Ali Rizg, told the government-sponsored Sudan Media Services (SMS) website that an emergency meeting was held in Al-Foula in the presence of the minister of decentralised governance, Farah Mustafa, and states’ security committee headed by West Kordofan governor, Ahmed Khamis.
He said the meeting decided to deploy “buffer forces” between areas of Ma’alia and Hamar tibes in order to control the situation.
The commissioner of Abu-Karnaka locality in East Darfur state, Osman Gism Hassan, for his part, said his locality will send joint forces to secure the border strip to prevent clashes between the two tribes, noting that deployment of the forces would promote security and prevent renewal of clashes.
A tribal leader from Hamar tribe, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the fighting which erupted on Monday in East Darfur was triggered by cattle looting incident, adding that clashes extended to West Kordofan on Tuesday.
He stressed that both sides used heavy weapons, saying that 22 people were killed and dozens of others injured.
A tribesman from Ma’alia also said fighting erupted on Monday and continued to the next day, pointing that he saw 10 bodies lying on the ground besides 20 wounded.
At least 29 tribesmen were killed and 23 others injured in clashes between the two tribes last May.
According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), some of the 38,000 displaced people in West Kordofan have fled recent fighting between the Hamar and Ma’alia tribes in North and East Darfur in March and April.
Tribal fighting has become the major source of insecurity in Darfur since the beginning of last year, forcing over 300,000 people to flee their homes.
Last year, Sudan’s president, Omer Hassan Al-Bashir, warned against tribal strife in some areas of the country, noting the country is facing challenges that need cooperation of all its people.
“The tribal conflicts in a number of Sudan’s areas constitute the biggest threat to the country," Bashir said when addressing a meeting of the Shura (consultative) Council of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP).
Different officials in Darfur including the head of the regional authority, Tijani El-Sissi, also said that tribal violence is among the biggest threats to ongoing efforts to implement a peace document signed by two former rebel groups in the region.
(ST)
Wednesday, 2 July 2014
The South Sudan state ....!!!!
2014/07/02 02:40
Khartoum: Ahmed Younis
Non si è verificato per un lungo periodo di conflitto, scoppiato nel Sudan meridionale, che ha visto quello che è successo a Juba il 15 dicembre (dicembre) e negli ultimi giorni che seguirono.
Dice Riek Machar, vicepresidente del Sud Sudan, il primo, che attualmente detiene la bandiera della rivolta contro Juba, ha detto che "il Sud non ha visto una tale brutalità e l'omicidio di identità, per tutto il periodo del governo del presidente Ismail al-Azhari negli anni Sessanta del secolo scorso, e Mohammed Ahmed Mahjoub, Jaafar Nimeiri, e bracciale in oro , e Sadiq al-Mahdi, e Omar al-Bashir », in un'intervista al quotidiano« il giorno dopo »Kherthomah, sono i governanti di Khartoum contro i meridionali che hanno combattuto una guerra che dura da più di mezzo secolo per la liberazione.
L'uomo ha detto di non dire quello che i separatisti settentrionali che credono che la guerra tribale del Sud Sudan se Sttahnh ha vinto la sua indipendenza, e ciò che non ha detto sostenitori che vedono l'unità in pericolo di separazione Mahaka. Machar aggiunge: «tutti quei presidenti non hanno fatto di loro ciò che ha fatto al Sud Sudan Presidente Salva Kiir, che è stato ucciso persone brutalmente intensi». Ha poi aggiunto: «Quello che è successo nel suo regno non è accaduto in tutte le epoche, è il presidente indossa una divisa militare e uccide i suoi cittadini, e va a cercare la propria casa, e chiedere: Questa persona è a casa? Cosa tribù? Poi emesso l'ordine di ucciderlo subito .. ».
* Compagni di guerra
* Questo era uno stato di sogno per il Sudan meridionale, che hanno combattuto per più di mezzo secolo per realizzare .. ucciso circa tre milioni e sfollati come loro, tra i paesi vicini, e ha sofferto in casa è rimasto il flagello della fame, la privazione e la mancanza di risorse. Quando il sogno si miraggio vero raccolti e rovina .. La guerra civile tra i figli sono i più violenti dalla fine della guerra con il nord .. un paese che soffre di estrema povertà, senza infrastrutture .. Senza di istituti di istruzione o della sanità o dei servizi .. tutte esercito proprietà di combattere un altro esercito in una lotta di potere .
Mi sono dimesso questo stato dopo un referendum approvato dalla Convenzione sulla pace sudanese conosciuta come Convenzione sulla «Naivasha», ha dichiarato uno stato indipendente, ponendo fine alla più lunga guerra civile scoppiata da prima dell'indipendenza del Sudan nel 1955, ed è stato fermato solo per breve è la durata della pace, che è stato raggiunto convenzione «Addis Ababa» al momento della il presidente Jaafar Nimeiri nel 1973 tra Khartoum e le forze «egoista» guidata da Joseph Lagu, poi la guerra scoppiò di nuovo nel 1983, dopo l'annuncio da leggi e accettazione del Sud Sudan Presidente Nimeiri Shari'ah divisi in tre regioni.
E ha combattuto il Movimento Popolare per la Liberazione del Sudan, guidata da guerra John Garang nuovamente contro l'esercito sudanese, e continuò fino al 2005 con la firma dell'accordo di pace del Sudan, che ha avuto luogo nella «Naivasha» Kenya, e ha trascorso parte di ciò che governata dando il popolo del Sud Sudan il diritto a un referendum sul destino di rimanere all'interno dello Stato del Sudan standard o la loro indipendenza e la formazione di uno stato indipendente. Quando il referendum, la voce dei meridionali la secessione dal Sudan - chiamano l'indipendenza - e hanno deciso di costituire un proprio Stato «Stato del Sud Sudan», di oltre il 98 per cento in un sondaggio condotto nel periodo dal 9 gennaio (gennaio) a 15 da l'anno 2011, e il 9 luglio (luglio 2011) ha dichiarato l'indipendenza dello Stato «Sud Sudan» Sudan ufficialmente, e riconosciuto da tutti i paesi del mondo, tra cui il Sudan, per annotare come i paesi più nuove del mondo, i nuovi membri delle Nazioni Unite.
Il raggiungimento dell'indipendenza, meridionali cominciò a sognare di uno stato controllare le loro aspirazioni e il benessere, ma hai controllato la corsa di sogno meridionale? Ho tutto analisti e gli osservatori ei paesi della regione a sognare dispersione dopo meno di due anni l'indipendenza della nazione nascente che, dal 9 luglio ha completato il suo secondo anno di uno stato indipendente.
Presto, una nuova guerra scoppiata tra gli «eroi della liberazione», o questo è quello che chiamano se stessi, nelle Movimento popolare per la liberazione del Sudan. E pescato «compagni di guerra lottano», da metà dicembre dello scorso anno e ancora, tra i due gruppi all'interno del partito di governo, presidente del gruppo Salva Kiir e un ex vice Riek Machar, ed erano entrambi i leader degli adulti ribellione del Sud che cercavano l'indipendenza per il loro paese.
I due uomini sono entrati in una lotta di potere è stato ben presto si è evoluto rapidamente in una guerra tribale cocente tra le due tribù più grande, sono Dinka del paese dal quale Presidente Salva Kiir, la tribù Nuer da cui il suo ex vice, Riek Machar.
In un periodo non superiore alla metà dell'anno, decine di migliaia sono stati uccisi sono stati uccisi l'identità, mentre spostando milioni di cittadini meridionali, e rivolto agli sfollati, alcuni si rifugiarono Bmaqrat Missione delle Nazioni Unite in Sud Sudan, e alcuni di loro sono tornati in Sudan di nuovo, anche se voci non ufficiali affermano che più di due milioni meridionale di nuovo tornato in Sudan dopo aver lasciato alla vigilia dell'indipendenza del loro paese, ora vivono per lo più nella capitale, Khartoum.
Gli analisti politici ritengono che il numero di morti che sono morti nel conflitto, Sud-Sud può superare il numero di quelli uccisi durante la guerra civile tra Sudan e Sud Sudan, che durò per tutto il periodo 1983-2005, che è costato la vita a 1,9 milioni, e sfollati a causa di oltre quattro milioni in 11 anni Omar è una guerra, se la guerra continuò per un periodo più lungo.
* Perdita di Compass
* Restituisce un gruppo scissionista del movimento popolare guidato dall'ex vicepresidente Riek Machar infermità dal Sud al governo del presidente Salva Kiir, e l'incapacità di realizzare le aspirazioni del popolo del Sud Sudan. Dice un portavoce del Movimento Popolare fedele a Riek Machar,
Demo of the Bashir Clan.
2014/07/02 09:07
Il più antico presidente del parlamento d. Fatih Izz al-Din al precedente è il primo del suo genere nella storia delle assemblee legislative nel paese dopo l'indipendenza, ha espulso il leader dell'opposizione in parlamento e leader del Bcobei d. Ismail Hussein Fadlallah della sessione per protestare contro la mancanza di opportunità a lui come capo del blocco secondo l'elenco, pur negando il Conquistatore e l'esistenza di qualsiasi blocco in parlamento a differenza della massa del partito di governo, c'era Mlasnat tagliente tra i due, e rifiutò Ismail silenzio, e chiese giudicare dalla lista del Parlamento, che descrive ciò che il presidente del Parlamento farsa, e lo ha accusato di custodia della Camera dei Rappresentanti, la sua luce fuori, e gli disse: «sessione libra briefings», con il rifiuto della leader dell'opposizione in origine, per soccombere affrontare Parlamento Speaker velo del parlamento diretto, rendendo Ismail uscire eco arrabbiato: «lo non cad faremo Nhan, abbiamo introdotto prigione o Oguetlna ma non sarà in silenzio ».
Giornale Alintibaha
Monday, 30 June 2014
A visit, just for hours.
VISIT
06-30-2014 01:57 AM
Sisi's visit came a sudden and embarrassing for the rule of Sudan's Bashir .. where he was met by a run-down cabin with his rule,
Mahjoub Hussein
■ have already pointed out in an article on this page under the title «task Marshal Sisi nationalism in Khartoum», to be threatened with Foreign facing the stability of a team rule Asion new more important and the pressure of the current leadership of the internal challenges, because it is associated system governance as a whole, as well as that these risks visible and invisible ones do not have a fixed roof at least with the other, existing or supervisor or default likely ousted in a counter-revolution to manage the nature of such a conflict.
It is known also in this direction that the chaos that hyped under the term «Arab Spring» modernist renaissance Democrat, swept many countries within the scheme may not without the awareness of the plot, has nothing to do with those values modernist to correct the path of reality, but it proved to make sure operationally that project to achieve the interests of authoritarian to enable the land through the mechanism of a terrorist, totalitarian aims primarily to eliminate the state institutions and their survival in the organic link with external forces and regional, as long accused by the forces opposed to her constantly in the confiscation of the right purity and purity and national political Kshan seizing the right relationship with God, this chaos that has its defeat in depth across the Egyptian bloc Egyptian historical enlightenment will continue to pose imminent danger of falling to Sisien Egyptians, unless action is taken and preventive measures and rapid and effective strategy in the west and south.
In this context came the highest priority and degree of red in the package the state of emergency strategic governance team, the new Egyptian toward the threats mentioned above without controversy, and this can be explained by a visit Marshal Sisi to Algeria in a plan first across a wider circle to round stream anarchists new Swear Arabic-based, led by Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Algeria, with the forces of many Arab, was shared by international powers have ties to and interests, and secondly in the circle smaller and is more accurate and content and the importance of privacy and concerned where Tripoli, which fell prey to the repercussions of the Arab Spring, which played a big role in the creation of a vacuum in Libya, and the absence of institutions authority of the state, something that has given way to the formation of the so-called «safe haven» to the forces of anarchists in Libya, which constitute a danger apparent to the Egyptian regime, as one of the safe havens for the forces of the current chaotic belt Egyptian, so this visit was a working visit security strategy necessarily be looking and take in the details of the details and mechanisms to the siege of the source of danger to the west in the region, and then drain its resources for the benefit of building the balance of internal political in Libya and the balance of new powers can stop tampering with the state, which turned into a place of a settling of accounts between the forces of several regional, and then work on the formation of real authority believes interests strategic and nationalism, both associated with securing the new ruling in Egypt, and reinforces this attitude leaks that campaign some news clippings about the call, Libyan opposition Haftar to visit Algeria, and calls for the last of the Egyptian president to participate in the fight against terrorism and its sources, as the title of a joint political stage between the countries in the region, apart from Sudanese regime involved and supportive of some factions of Libya and Egypt and Saudi Arabia, both Balaioae or providing weapons or other facilities, such as the receipt of weapons deals funded regionally in favor of one faction or groups, as happened in the receipt of the arms deal funded by the State of Serbia and turn it into one of the groups Libyan fighter, and as a reaction from one of the factions of anti-faction aforementioned, was bombed Sudanese embassy in Tripoli mortar recently, that occur without loss of life.
And Moish with it and within the insurance plan strategy for the regime of Egyptian south, landed the Egyptian president last Friday within the line of his return from the African Union summit held in Equatorial Guinea, in Khartoum for two or three hours any transit - was received by the Sudanese President, tired, with cabins reign, and away from the statement Foreign traditional «discussed bilateral relations between the two parties and to check on the health of President», visit came a sudden and embarrassing for the rule of Sudan, for reasons unknown, however, it seems that Khartoum is still in the Hall of shock and surprise, prompted by a lack of methodology for managing relations with Cairo «new», plus files Sudanese cities occupied, which is said to be - sold imminent liberalization was released and signed since the era of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, in exchange for Scott's recent assassination - the most important visit in the «Insurance» Egyptian, that there is a specific liabilities beyond Khartoum.
First, the delivery of all elements of Egyptian Islamist leadership that went to Khartoum after the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood, and was told that there was a list made of seventeen individuals.
Second: Khartoum's commitment to non-cooperation with the members of the group do not Balaioae or reception, but prompt delivery.
Third, control the movement of arms Activity flights to Sinai through Sudan.
Fourth, raise their cooperation with Aslamoi Libya, and notes that all liabilities urgent and necessary to Cairo, but is »Help» military Given the seriousness of the file.
And not even located the Sudanese regime in the circle of anger on them Egyptians, and also used the system Sudanese do not reign him with one, you will hear «fully O Afendim HE Marshal Egyptian», and pain at least Marshal Alsodadenei of Mushir al-Masri «We have advised the group
Sisi's visit came a sudden and embarrassing for the rule of Sudan's Bashir .. where he was met by a run-down cabin with his rule,
Mahjoub Hussein
■ have already pointed out in an article on this page under the title «task Marshal Sisi nationalism in Khartoum», to be threatened with Foreign facing the stability of a team rule Asion new more important and the pressure of the current leadership of the internal challenges, because it is associated system governance as a whole, as well as that these risks visible and invisible ones do not have a fixed roof at least with the other, existing or supervisor or default likely ousted in a counter-revolution to manage the nature of such a conflict.
It is known also in this direction that the chaos that hyped under the term «Arab Spring» modernist renaissance Democrat, swept many countries within the scheme may not without the awareness of the plot, has nothing to do with those values modernist to correct the path of reality, but it proved to make sure operationally that project to achieve the interests of authoritarian to enable the land through the mechanism of a terrorist, totalitarian aims primarily to eliminate the state institutions and their survival in the organic link with external forces and regional, as long accused by the forces opposed to her constantly in the confiscation of the right purity and purity and national political Kshan seizing the right relationship with God, this chaos that has its defeat in depth across the Egyptian bloc Egyptian historical enlightenment will continue to pose imminent danger of falling to Sisien Egyptians, unless action is taken and preventive measures and rapid and effective strategy in the west and south.
In this context came the highest priority and degree of red in the package the state of emergency strategic governance team, the new Egyptian toward the threats mentioned above without controversy, and this can be explained by a visit Marshal Sisi to Algeria in a plan first across a wider circle to round stream anarchists new Swear Arabic-based, led by Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Algeria, with the forces of many Arab, was shared by international powers have ties to and interests, and secondly in the circle smaller and is more accurate and content and the importance of privacy and concerned where Tripoli, which fell prey to the repercussions of the Arab Spring, which played a big role in the creation of a vacuum in Libya, and the absence of institutions authority of the state, something that has given way to the formation of the so-called «safe haven» to the forces of anarchists in Libya, which constitute a danger apparent to the Egyptian regime, as one of the safe havens for the forces of the current chaotic belt Egyptian, so this visit was a working visit security strategy necessarily be looking and take in the details of the details and mechanisms to the siege of the source of danger to the west in the region, and then drain its resources for the benefit of building the balance of internal political in Libya and the balance of new powers can stop tampering with the state, which turned into a place of a settling of accounts between the forces of several regional, and then work on the formation of real authority believes interests strategic and nationalism, both associated with securing the new ruling in Egypt, and reinforces this attitude leaks that campaign some news clippings about the call, Libyan opposition Haftar to visit Algeria, and calls for the last of the Egyptian president to participate in the fight against terrorism and its sources, as the title of a joint political stage between the countries in the region, apart from Sudanese regime involved and supportive of some factions of Libya and Egypt and Saudi Arabia, both Balaioae or providing weapons or other facilities, such as the receipt of weapons deals funded regionally in favor of one faction or groups, as happened in the receipt of the arms deal funded by the State of Serbia and turn it into one of the groups Libyan fighter, and as a reaction from one of the factions of anti-faction aforementioned, was bombed Sudanese embassy in Tripoli mortar recently, that occur without loss of life.
And Moish with it and within the insurance plan strategy for the regime of Egyptian south, landed the Egyptian president last Friday within the line of his return from the African Union summit held in Equatorial Guinea, in Khartoum for two or three hours any transit - was received by the Sudanese President, tired, with cabins reign, and away from the statement Foreign traditional «discussed bilateral relations between the two parties and to check on the health of President», visit came a sudden and embarrassing for the rule of Sudan, for reasons unknown, however, it seems that Khartoum is still in the Hall of shock and surprise, prompted by a lack of methodology for managing relations with Cairo «new», plus files Sudanese cities occupied, which is said to be - sold imminent liberalization was released and signed since the era of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, in exchange for Scott's recent assassination - the most important visit in the «Insurance» Egyptian, that there is a specific liabilities beyond Khartoum.
First, the delivery of all elements of Egyptian Islamist leadership that went to Khartoum after the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood, and was told that there was a list made of seventeen individuals.
Second: Khartoum's commitment to non-cooperation with the members of the group do not Balaioae or reception, but prompt delivery.
Third, control the movement of arms Activity flights to Sinai through Sudan.
Fourth, raise their cooperation with Aslamoi Libya, and notes that all liabilities urgent and necessary to Cairo, but is »Help» military Given the seriousness of the file.
And not even located the Sudanese regime in the circle of anger on them Egyptians, and also used the system Sudanese do not reign him with one, you will hear «fully O Afendim HE Marshal Egyptian», and pain at least Marshal Alsodadenei of Mushir al-Masri «We have advised the group
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)